jeebench_chat_cot: by examples

Results Paper Code


Not solved by any model

There are 72 examples not solved by any model. Solving some of these can be a good signal that your model is indeed better than leading models if these are good problems.
368, 370, 376, 379, 381, 387, 388, 389, 391, 393, 394, 404, 406, 407, 411, 412, 413, 414, 417, 419, 420, 421, 422, 423, 424, 427, 428, 429, 431, 435, 442, 451, 452, 453, 454, 455, 456, 457, 459, 461, 462, 463, 466, 467, 469, 470, 471, 473, 474, 477, 478, 479, 481, 482, 484, 485, 487, 488, 489, 490, 491, 495, 497, 500, 501, 502, 507, 508, 509, 510, 512, 513

Problems solved by 1 model only

example_link model min_pass1_of_model
499 google_gemma_3_12b_it 0.276
244 qwen2-72b-instruct 0.254
443 qwen3-32b 0.249
223 qwen3-32b 0.249
498 qwen2.5-coder-32b-instruct 0.237
378 qwen1.5-72b-chat 0.134
383 qwen2-math-72b-instruct 0.114
458 llama-3.1-8B-instruct 0.105
397 qwen3-1.7b 0.066
415 qwen3-1.7b 0.066
386 mistralai_mathstral_7b_v0.1 0.051
390 google_gemma_3_1b_it 0.042
464 deepseek_r1_distill_llama_8b 0.035
329 qwen2.5-coder-0.5b-instruct 0.017

Suspect problems

These are 10 problems with the lowest correlation with the overall evaluation (i.e. better models tend to do worse on these. )

example_link pass1_of_ex tau
329 0.002 -0.202
401 0.019 -0.192
464 0.002 -0.168
382 0.077 -0.156
436 0.045 -0.149
384 0.012 -0.141
286 0.021 -0.138
390 0.002 -0.135
503 0.022 -0.135
30 0.061 -0.134

Histogram of accuracies

Histogram of problems by the accuracy on each problem.

Histogram of difficulties

Histogram of problems by the minimum win rate to solve each problem.